Métadonnées de forfait analytique

Reconciliation of picked, probed and confirmed indicator mineral grain counts (Morrison/GSC, 1996)



Téléchargement de forfait analytique

Télécharger les données analytiques de ce forfait dans l'un des trois formats, selon la convention souhaitée pour le traitement des valeurs en dessous de la limite inférieure de détection:

Description du forfait analytique

Laboratoire: Aucun laboratoire n’a était nécessaire

Kimberlite indicator mineral grain counts reported by I and M Morrison are presented alongside the number of grains analysed by microprobe, and the mineral identifications assigned based on the microprobe analysis.

Indicator mineral identification typically involves an initial picking phase, using a binocular microscope, followed by electron microprobe analysis to confirm the identification and gain additional data on the mineral chemistry.  The picked grains are often referred to as “potential” indicator minerals, prior to confirmation by microprobe.  In order to evaluate the data quality, it is useful to know how many of the picked grains were analysed by microprobe, and how many were confirmed to correspond to what was picked.

In general, reports do not explicitly include this information, but it may be possible to deduce it, subject to the following caveats:

  • The list of grains that were searched for by the picking laboratory should be known.  Grains may be searched for, but not found, and hence not reported.  This is commonly the case for diamond – always looked for, but very rarely found.  Ideally, detailed criteria for the searching should be known.  For example, when searching for garnets, what are the criteria for discriminating based on colour (e.g. did the lab distinguish between purple and red garnets?).  In a typical kimberlite indicator mineral picking, only six or seven different kinds of grains will be picked (peridotitic (purple) garnet, eclogitic (orange) garnet, chrome diopside (green), ilmenite, chromite, forsterite, diamond).  Other kinds of indicator mineral picking may yield a much greater variety of picked grains.
  • The picked grains are usually mounted in epoxy on 25 mm diameter lucite disks, with several hundred grains on a single disk.  A “map” is created by the mounting laboratory, referencing the original grain ID with its position on the mount.  The map is needed to link the picked grain to the probe analysis.  In practice, these maps are very rarely published, making it impossible to unequivocally associate a specific picked grain with a probe analysis.
  • The microprobe analysis returns a “complete” analysis of major oxides in the grain, which should sum to almost 100% for most minerals.  It is then possible to make a good guess about the identity of the mineral.  It is sometimes difficult to make a positive identification because (a) many minerals form complex solid solutions, and (b) some components (e.g. carbonate, phosphate) cannot be analysed by electron microprobe.
  • Classification of mineral identities may vary according to the requirements of the study.  For example, what are the chromium concentrations that separate low-chrome-diopside from chrome diopside from high-chrome diopside?  Should low-chrome diopside be considered a KIM?

Peculiarities of this package include:

  • Zircon was picked, but this mineral is not indicative of kimberlite.

 

Suites analytiques

IndexNom
1  Reconciliation of picked, probed and confirmed indicator mineral grain counts (Morrison, 1996). ( Picked grains )
2  Reconciliation of picked, probed and confirmed indicator mineral grain counts (Morrison, 1996). ( Probed grains )
3  Reconciliation of picked, probed and confirmed indicator mineral grain counts (Morrison, 1996). ( Confirmed grains )

Méthodes analytiques

IndexNom de la colonneClassement de la suiteClassement de la méthodRépétition de la suiteSubstanceUnitésLimite de détermination
1  GP_1    KIM GP  coup  
2  IL_1    KIM IM  coup  
3  CR_1    KIM CR  coup  
4  DC_1    KIM DC  coup  
5  ZR_1    Zrn  coup  
6  OL_1    Ol  coup  
7  GP_2    KIM GP  coup  
8  IL_2    KIM IM  coup  
9  CR_2    KIM CR  coup  
10  DC_2    KIM DC  coup  
11  ZR_2    Zrn  coup  
12  OL_2    Ol  coup  
13  GP_3    KIM GP  coup  
14  IL_3    KIM IM  coup  
15  CR_3    KIM CR  coup  
16  DC_3    KIM DC  coup  
17  ZR_3    Zrn  coup  
18  OL_3    Ol  coup  

Faisceaux analytiques associés

IndexID du faisceauNom du faisceauAnnée
1  210989     GSC/TSD -1995-Contwoyto Lake 76E (north) Till: Picked Grain Probe Checks   1996
Date de modification